Logics for Two Fragments beyond the Syllogistic Boundary
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper is a contribution to natural logic, the study of logical systems for linguistic reasoning. We construct a system with the following properties: its syntax is closer to that of a natural language than is first-order logic; it can faithfully represent simple sentences with standard quantifiers, subject relative clauses (a recursive construct), and negation on nouns and verbs. We also give a proof system which is complete and has the finite model property. We go further by adding comparative adjective phrases, assuming interpretations by transitive relations. This last system has all the previously-mentioned properties as well. The paper was written for theoretical computer scientists and logicians interested in areas such as decidability questions for fragments of first-order logic, modal logic, and natural deduction.
منابع مشابه
Syllogistic Logics with Verbs
This paper provides sound and complete logical systems for several fragments of English which go beyond syllogistic logic in that they use verbs as well as other limited syntactic material: universally and existentially quantified noun phrases, building on the work of Nishihara, Morita, and Iwata [7]; complemented noun phrases, following our [6]; and noun phrases which might contain relative cl...
متن کاملLogics for the Relational Syllogistic
The Aristotelian syllogistic cannot account for the validity of certain inferences involving relational facts. In this paper, we investigate the prospects for providing a relational syllogistic. We identify several fragments based on (a) whether negation is permitted on all nouns, including those in the subject of a sentence; and (b) whether the subject noun phrase may contain a relative clause...
متن کاملOn the Complexity of the Numerically Definite Syllogistic and Related Fragments
In this paper, we determine the complexity of the satisfiability problem for various logics obtained by adding numerical quantifiers, and other constructions, to the traditional syllogistic. In addition, we demonstrate the incompleteness of some recently proposed proof-systems for these logics.
متن کاملThe probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning.
A probability heuristic model (PHM) for syllogistic reasoning is proposed. An informational ordering over quantified statements suggests simple probability based heuristics for syllogistic reasoning. The most important is the "min-heuristic": choose the type of the least informative premise as the type of the conclusion. The rationality of this heuristic is confirmed by an analysis of the proba...
متن کاملArithmetizations of Syllogistic à la Leibniz
à Lukasiewicz had every reason to suppose that Leibniz’s winged Calculemus! had been connected with the Aristotelian syllogistic [4, § 34]. Indeed, after Louis Couturat’s pioneer efforts in commenting and publishing Leibniz’s logical opuscula ([1], [2]). The basic idea of the arithmetization of syllogistic was to establish a correspondence between terms and suitable integers (the characteristic...
متن کامل